Recovery Time Models for Natural and Anthropogenic Disasters on Mindanao
Keywords:
Anthropogenic disaster, natural disaster, dose-response model, logistic modelAbstract
This study proposed to develop models for recovery periods for the survivors of both natural and anthropogenic disasters in Mindanao using the 2011-2012 typhoons as basis for the natural disaster component and the Lanao del Norte-Maguindanao massacre as illustrative cases for anthropogenic disasters. The process of recovery is gradual and it takes time to fully recover. The phenomenon can be modelled as Dose Response curve. Results revealed that the survivors in natural calamities can recover faster compared to survivors of man-made calamities. The latter survivors have to contend with personal and psychological issues that will take a longer healing process. On the other hand, survivors of natural calamities do not have any person to blame because the calamities are part of Nature and so acceptance is far easier for them. Physical rehabilitation of damaged infrastructure and community facilities form part of the healing process for the survivors of natural calamities. This is not the case for man-made disaster survivors. In a natural calamity, the recovery time of survivors will depend on the intensity of the disaster. In anthropogenic disasters, the recovery time of survivors will depend on the casualties. The rates of recovery are estimated using the logistic regression method while the odds of recovery after time (t) are computed from the regression results.
References
Altshuler, B (1981). "Modeling of Dose-Response Relationships". (Environmental Health Perspectives 42: 23–27).
Bates, D. and D. Watts (1988). Nonlinear regression analysis.( New York: John Wiley and Sons. p. 365).
Quarantelli, E. L. (2008). “Conventional Beliefs and Counterintuitive Realities”.( Conventional Beliefs and Counterintuitive Realities in Social Research: an international Quarterly of the social Sciences, Vol. 75 (3): 873–904).
Kahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (1984). “Choices, Values and frames”.( American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–350).
Aguirre, B. E & Quarantelli, E. H. (2008). “Phenomenology of Death Counts in Disasters: the invisible dead in the 9/11 WTC attack”. (International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters. Vol. 26 (1): 19–39).
Wilson, H. (2010). “Divine Sovereignty and The Global Climate Change debate”. (Essays in Philosophy. Vol. 11 (1): 1–7)
Uscher-Pines, L. (2009). “Health effects of Relocation following disasters: a systematic review of literature”. (Disasters. Vol. 33 (1): 1–22).
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2005). “Katrina: the disaster and its doubles”. (Anthropology Today. Vol. 21 (6)).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Treshhold
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.