Marine Ecosystem Protection Trade-off Economic Model with Terrestrial Ecosystem Exploitation in Fishing Communities Near Marine Protected Areas
Keywords:
trade-off model, marine protection, terrestrial ecosystem, stochastic modelAbstract
The total ban on fishing in marine protected areas entailed that fishermen in nearby fishing communities look for alternative livelihood. Often, such alternative livelihoods exploit the remaining terrestrial ecosystem found within or near to these fishing communities. This paper introduced a trade-off economic model for marine protectionterrestrial exploitation through a Marine Protection Terrestrial Exploitation Curve (MPTEC). The peculiar characteristics of the fishing communities near marine protected areas (MPAs) are inputted to the trade-off model. Simulation results revealed that for the optimistic case (communities which are better educated and with small household sizes), the terrestrial ecosystems’ damage rate ranged from 3.7% to 28% for MPA sizes ranging from 3 hectares to 30 hectares while in the worst case scenario (communities which have 6 years or less of schooling and with larger household sizes), the estimated damage rates for the terrestrial ecosystems ranged from a low of 8% to a high of 37% for the same range of MPA sizes. Damage to the terrestrial ecosystems within the fishing communities close to marine protected areas can be mitigated by minimizing the exploitation rate ρ which in turn depends on the socio-demographic characteristics of these communities. Alternative livelihood programs for affected fishing communities should veer them away from livelihoods that make use of raw materials coming from the various terrestrial ecosystems e.g. mangroves. Ecotourism is one such livelihood project recommended following the Apo Island, Negros experience in the Philippines.
References
Alcala, Angel C. et al. (2009) . Directory of Marine Reserves in the Visayas, Philippines (Funded by the Department of Foreign Affairs, Philippines)
____, 1938, "Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment," Economic Journal, 43(4), 635-41
_____, 1977. "Reaffirming the Existence of 'Reasonable' Bergson-Samuelson Social Welfare Functions," Economica, N.S., 44(173), pp. 81-88. Reprinted in (1986) The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, pp. 47-54.
Abesamis, R. A., and G. R. Russ. 2005. Density-dependent spillover from a marine reserve: long-term evidence. Ecological Applications 15:1798–1812.
Abram Bergson (Burk),"A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52(2), February 1938, 310-34
Airame, S., J. E. Dugan, K. D. Lafferty, H. Leslie, D. A. McArdle, and R. R. Warner. 2003. Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: a case study from the California Channel Islands. Ecological Applications 13:S170–S184.
Allison, G. W., J. Lubchenco, and M. H. Carr. 1998. Marine Reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecological Applications 8:S79–S92.
Arrhenius, O. 1921. Species and area. Journal of Ecology 9:95–99.
Beechie, T., E. Buhle, M. Ruckelshaus, A. Fullerton, and L. Holsinger. 2006. Hydrologic regime and the conservation of salmon life history diversity. Biological Conservation 130:560–572.
Brockington, D., J. Igoe, and K. Schmidt-Soltau. 2006. Conservation, human rights, and poverty reduction. Conservation Biology 20:250–252.
Brown, K., W. N. Adger, E. Tompkins, P. Bacon, D. Shim, and K. Young. 2001. Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecological Economics 37:417–434
Chittaro, P. M., Kaplan, I. C., Keller, A. and Levin, P. S. (2010), Trade-Offs between Species Conservation and the Size of Marine Protected Areas. Conservation Biology, 24: 197–206.
Hicks, C. C., T. R. McClanahan, J. E. Cinner, and J. M. Hills. 2009. Trade-offs in values assigned to ecological goods and services associated with different coral reef management strategies. Ecology and Society 14(1): 10.
James E. Foster and Amartya Sen, 1996, On Economic Inequality, expanded edition with annexes.
Jan de Van Graaff, 1957, "Theoretical Welfare Economics", 1957, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
John C. Harsanyi, 1987, ―interpersonal utility comparisons," The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, v. 2, 955-58
Kenneth J. Arrow, 1951, 2nd ed., 1963, Social Choice and Individual Values
Lionel Robbins, 1935, 2nd ed.. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, ch. VI
Paul A. Samuelson, 1947, Enlarged ed. 1983, Foundations of Economic Analysis, pp. xxi-xxiv & ch. VIII, "Welfare Economics,"
Prasanta K. Pattanaik (2008). "social welfare function." The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition Abstract.
_____, 1981. "Bergsonian Welfare Economics", in S. Rosefielde (ed.), Economic Welfare and the Economics of Soviet Socialism: Essays in Honor of Abram Bergson, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 223-66. Reprinted in (1986) The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, pp. 3-46.
Sen, Amartya K. (1963). "Distribution, Transitivity and Little's Welfare Criteria," Economic Journal, 73(292), p. 771-78.
_____ , 1970 [1984], Collective Choice and Social Welfare (description), ch. 3, "Collective Rationality."
_____ (1982). Choice, Welfare and Measurement, MIT Press. Description and scroll to chapter-preview links.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Treshhold
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.